This module tells the story of the National Centre for Quality Improvement in Indigenous Primary Health Care.
It explains the six stages of the One21seventy continuous quality improvement cycle and outlines its underpinning research in health centres.
The module highlights features of the One21seventy model that support its continuing uptake in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander primary health care settings.
The name One21seventy reflects the Centre’s commitment to increasing life expectancy for Indigenous people beyond one year in infancy, twenty-one years in youth and seventy years across the life span.
Take a moment to read the centre's goals, which focus on workforce capability in CQI; on sustainability in CQI structures and processes; and on leading the way in providing high quality, evidence-based CQI products and services for use in Indigenous primary health care.
The agreement covers confidentiality, intellectual property, terms and conditions.
Orientation training then prepares staff to undertake CQI.
Clinical auditing collects demographic, service delivery and clinical indicator data from the health service population, based on a sample of client records specific to each audit tool, for example, child health. Health promotion auditing collects data about health promotion activities, for example, a diabetes education program. A systems assessment tool is used by staff to assess the systems that support client care. A Health Centre and Community Survey collects data such as location, population size, governance and staffing. Data are entered into the secure One21seventy web based information system.
The web based reporting system analyses the data and generates a report for each audit tool used.
Reports present data as graphs and tables, and include de-identified area, state or territory, and national data so that health centres can benchmark their performance.
Reports are interpreted by local health teams, taking into account community and health service characteristics.
This participatory interpretation is used to prioritise and plan improvements to organisational processes and systems, to support best practice.
The planned changes are put into action.
Effects are reviewed when data are collected and analysed in the following audit cycle.
Underpinned by international evidence, the project demonstrated that a CQI model could be effective in supporting Indigenous primary health care centres to use evidence-based good practice in chronic illness care.
CQI research continues through the ABCD National Research Partnership Project, which works alongside One21seventy to continue to develop the available evidence-base, and to answer research questions relevant to quality improvement.
Play the video to hear the story.
They include a participatory approach, customer focus, and flexibility to suit local contexts.
Emphasis on tackling underlying causes and improving outcomes, on capacity building, and a culture of self-evaluation rather than blame fit well with community needs and values.
This is an important message - the One21seventy model views service gaps not as poor service, but as opportunities for improvement.
Real improvements come from staff thinking strategically, because they are the experts with practical knowledge of what's possible and manageable, and what strategies are likely to work locally.
The One21seventy CQI cycle provides a structure to continually refine programs to build on and sustain those positive changes.
This graph shows Type 2 Diabetes service delivery by primary health care services in the Northern Territory that have been participating in the ABCD National Research Partnership.
These are interim data at the end of April 2013. They show trends over time for the 22 health centres that had completed four or more audit cycles.
This is how to read the box plot. Top and bottom lines of the whiskers show the range of T2D service delivery (minimum to maximum percentages).
The median line is the middle percentage of delivery - approximately 58% in cycle 1, 77% in cycle 4. The box in Cycle 1 shows that 50% of health centres delivered between 50% and 65% of scheduled T2D services.
This improved so that by cycle 4, half of the health centres delivered between approximately 72% and 82% of scheduled services.
A smaller box and shorter whiskers indicate less variation in the delivery of the 17 scheduled services for T2D care.
A larger box and ;longer whiskers indicate more variation in service delivery.
The dot beneath the cycle 4 box plot is an ‘outlier’, an unusual percentage from just one health centre.
----------------------------------------------
The data show that over 4 audit cycles the median delivery of Type 2 Diabetes services has increased by approximately 20%, from 58% in cycle 1 to 77% in cycle 4.
Variation in service delivery has decreased over audit cycles. Encouragingly, health centres at the lower end (represented by a bottom whisker or outlier) have improved service delivery over the 4 audit cycles from 35% to 58%.
The outlier dot in cycle 4 shows that one health centre delivered 58% of scheduled services, markedly different to other health centres in that cycle that ranged from 65% to 90%.
Comparable data showing improved clinical indicators are also available.
When working in remote areas, we have so many guidelines to follow we can start to think, ‘Are we heading in the right direction?'
I like the audit process because it keeps me on track.
From day one, I knew that the Maternal and Child Health audit tools could give me some national guidelines and I could change some of my practices to make sure they reflected against what I wanted to achieve.
Even having negative results from the auditing was good - it gave the team somewhere to start and direction in how to improve each year.
I can track all our data and the audit process helps me out. When it's pointed out that we are going poorly in one area, I can say ‘… [For example], but we are picking up more women with abnormal results in pregnancy because they are having more checks, whereas before they had none. We're going to get better outcomes in the future because we are now seeing them more often'. We were doing poorly each year with scoring of one perinatal assessment scale for social and emotional wellbeing, … this result helped us to arrange a local, culturally appropriate support service through our community support workers.
In the report the data is sitting in front of you. It's highlighting ongoing gaps but it's also making me revisit every year to find out what other people are doing to tackle that issue. The reports keep us on track with our goals and actions and jog our memories to keep revising them.
A health promotion audit tool supports improved health promotion practice.
Further tools are being developed to respond to the need for CQI resources to reflect comprehensive primary health care and population health needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
The CQI tools and processes have been developed and are regularly reviewed by healthcare practitioners working in Indigenous primary health care services.
This approach has resulted in an emphasis on training and support, on easy data entry and ‘real-time' reporting that provides local teams with information needed to identify priorities for system improvement.
Module three introduces One21seventy clinical CQI tools, resources and reports. It explains data collection, analysis and feedback processes.
You can either do the brief assessment quiz, or complete the optional task, which is designed for individual reflection or group discussion with colleagues who have completed the module.
The optional task won’t be assessed - so you are encouraged to discuss your work with your local CQI facilitator.
Once you begin the quiz, you can’t exit until all questions are answered.
Here are some useful links and documents: